Religion of Medical Science in Current Events

Germ theory is pseudoscience. Contagion is a myth. They’re not proven theories. Terrain theory refutes germ theory but that is not an easy conversation to have right now. I don’t know what paradigm of information to work with when I try and discuss con-19 with that cult. I say cult because if you can’t question the science then what you have is a dogma. It’s hard to listen to these people bring that hoax to life. The hoax that is commie-19, let alone germ theory. We should switch the conversation away from the strength of a mythical virus to the strength of the body. There is nothing to be afraid of. Humanity is in a spiritual deficit and too many do not have any aluminum-free brain cells to rub together to try and apply logic and reason. I wrote this yesterday on my socialist media after I tried to debate the cable news suicide cult, all they have is a fundamental belief that their news is real and that they would never fall for propaganda. In their cult, if information doesn’t come to them from their news then it is misinformation. They have this false-belief that if information comes through a phone then it came from the devil or something. This suicide cult is that brainwashed.

Do COVID-19 survivors need a vaccine? According to their science dogma, yes because their claim is that we can catch it twice and spread it twice. Within the pseudoscience that is germ theory, antibodies destroy the virus. A vaccine gives you the virus so you can develop antibodies. So if you survive con-19 did your body not make any antibodies strong enough to kill the virus demon? If somebody previously infected, or not, takes this mRNA vaccine to make antibodies against a virus will they be protected or will they be diseased?

Within the contagion myth, let alone the new dogma that we are all sick until proven healthy, if asymptomatic healthy people can be carriers of a mythical pathogen and an experimental vaccine just makes some people asymptomatic, does that stop a spread? Or is that the spread?

The science priests tell us that we need to wear a mask because the moisture in our mouths can spread con-19 and cause a demonic infection in others. Why would they not swab the inside of our mouths instead of probing near the blood brain barrier?

If somebody needs to be infected to be called a case and a PCR test does not determine infection or if a person is infectious, can you still call it a case? Especially when the PCR only determines if what they’re looking for is present or has been present in the past? Regardless of if it’s dead, inactive or clinically insignificant? Especially when it produces false positives most of the time?

Hypothetical question, if a PCR can generate a positive test by just simply running the amplification cycles enough times can somebody manufacture case counts by mandating high thresholds? So they can hypothetically use case counts to justify medical tyranny?

If the decision makers keep trying to protect people from income and infection with their lockdowns and mask mandates, why would their mandated medical decisions suddenly be any different?

Hypothetical question, if a foreign nation wanted to invade your country but figured that a nuclear weapon was too 1945 and wanted something more subtle and thus seized your media and politicians instead and used them to convince you that you needed to take their lethal injection, how would you know?