"The foundation of such a method, is Love." in anticlimatic

  • Sept. 2, 2024, 12:52 p.m.
  • |
  • Public

I love you Sherriff Truman.
Not literally. That’s just how the quote ends.

I can’t deal with the nihilistic fuckboy lyrics of the 2020s. I just can’t. We were raised on our parent’s hippie music. Love was all we needed. And don’t you want somebody to love? And don’t you need somebody to love? For those who come to San Francisco, summertime will be a Love-In there. Love, love me do! You know I love you!

It was dated and cheesy, but it laid some groundwork just below a visible level- cultivated at environment, you might say. A worldview. A system of rules, and ideas. A culture of romanticism, carried on enlightenment values and a renewed sense of hope and progress.

It paired well with Christianity, which was a different set of rules, but was quite popular. Both were romantic tales, yet at the same time both tales seemed to be at odds with one another- the secular tale of human progress through the discovery of objective truth, which we could say is synonymous with beauty, and the religious tale which would say that God is synonymous with Truth and Beauty, and that he so Loved the world that he sent his only son to Die for the sins of the species.

I myself was on the side of liberal values once I became a teenager and objectively discovered for myself an evidence-based lack of faith in the God described to me by church folk. Both sides went to war in my world throughout the 90s and 2000s, and in the end after the dust settled across this new internet battlefield, both sides seem to have completely blown themselves out.

Am I missing something? Some avenue, maybe, into the culture and zeitgeist that I’ve overlooked from my hermitage? People don’t seem to be the delusional romantics that my generation was raised to be. The two most recent songs I discovered that seemed to hint at The Divine just behind the limits of reality, at least from a music theory perspective, had bafflingly shallow and hedonistic lyrics; “Sweet” by Cigarettes after Sex, and that “Excuse me, you look like you love me” country song. Both are just songs about hookups with near strangers, for purposes of pleasure.

The point of Love isn’t pleasure. The point of relationships isn’t pleasure. Pleasure is incidental, often, but the actual purpose is so much bigger and more important and more rich with meaning. The nuance to the concept, seemingly betrayed by the simplicity of the Love Love Love messaging in culture from the pre-internet era, was so vast and worthy of exploration. I thought it would be the work that society did over my lifetime, perhaps towards some great Truth hidden within, yet to be uncovered by human beings. A truth that could lead to greater harmony between the sexes, between families, between women, and between men. A harmony that we could use to stop damaging our children beyond repair.

Instead it was blown out in a weird sort of battle with itself and all but forgotten. Time spent under work and philosophy gave way to laziness and self-service. Now here we are today, confused and spinning. Or at least I am.

It leaves me with the unsettling impression that society is evolving backwards…though it might just be my own ageing into irrelevance that I am projecting onto the world. The later option I find to be more comforting, though that’s usually an indicator that it is probably not the one.


Last updated September 02, 2024


Deleted user September 02, 2024

We oscillate as cultures. A big difference now is how easy it is for any message to be amplified, and also to be received. Used to be harder to get into print, television, radio -- any of the big means of mass communication. Now pretty much any idea can get traction and get amplified. This does not bode well for biologies that thrive on stimulation and have a tendency towards anxiety. Pop culture, especially that connected to profit, has pretty much always been a collective place for the lowest common denominator. It has not really been a thriving ground for depth, and especially these days it seems it attracts (oft naive) bravado. And narcissism, but that goes for any field that grants attention and power/money.

Cool post. Thank you.

anticlimatic Deleted user ⋅ September 02, 2024

Thanks for your comment. I've heard it said that we are in a new dark ages, this time by way of too much information rather than too little, but with the same end result.

Deleted user anticlimatic ⋅ September 02, 2024

Sounds dramatic :) Regardless, what we have learned is that a) access to information does not equate with understanding nor with utilization of access nor with how to parse the information, leading to b) information overload can result in the well-known decision and understanding paralyses and even counter effects such as rejection of the information en masse to support biases or relieve stressors, which leads us to c) one's social system has a tendency towards a framing effect on both the types of information received and how it is processed.

In my opinion, for whatever that is worth, the most important knowledge aligns with emotional intelligence, since it plays a heavy role in behavior and knowledge framing. After that would be critical thinking, how to process and parse information. We have all I'm sure met highly intelligent people who make rash and/or biases decisions that fly in the face of evidence. I have also met people who aren't highly intelligent by traditional definitions, but they have learned to sit and chew and mull things over and often come to better conclusions and decisions than others around them. It may take them longer, but the result is worth it. That seems to be an intelligence in itself.

Sleepy-Eyed John September 02, 2024

Best entry I've read in awhile. Nicely done, again, good sir.

anticlimatic Sleepy-Eyed John ⋅ September 02, 2024

Thank you my friend.

You must be logged in to comment. Please sign in or join Prosebox to leave a comment.